HMRC lose IR35 case over Mutuality of Obligation
20 May 2020
20 May 2020
“We reject HMRC’s contention that the requirement that there be mutuality of obligation is irrelevant to the categorisation of the contract as one of employment or one for services, beyond merely requiring that the services be performed personally.”
View the FFT decision here.
View the UT decision here.
Aspire Comment
This case is further evidence of the importance of consideration of MOO in deciding employment status. This case puts a clear emphasis on the complexity of employment status that cannot be accurately determined by HMRC’s online tool (“CEST”) which fails to account for consideration of MOO.
With the off-payroll working rules due to change on 6 April 2021, it is imperative that employers do not rely on blanket determinations. Businesses will be liable for determining the tax status of contractors who work through Personal Service Companies, and failure to apply the correct legislation will result in tax and national insurance liabilities.
If you need any support on IR35, due diligence or any other employment matters, call us today on 0121 445 6178 or email enquire@aspirepartnership.co.uk.